Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs
dieterbsd at engineer.com
dieterbsd at engineer.com
Sat Jan 8 00:44:02 UTC 2011
- Previous message: Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs
- Next message: Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Paul:
> EXT3 - ~3000 tps
> EXT4 - ~3800 tps
> XFS - ~ 1800 tps
> ZFS - 75000 tps
The result for FFS w/softdeps seems to have been lost in the mail. :-(
Mark:
> They certainly have earned the title Moronix either way.
For me, getting a debugging flag wrong (assuming they did, there seems
to be some question) pales in comparison with "my adventure to the
Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster Site".
There's a reason I think of linux types as bird brains, and it isn't
just
because of Tux.
- Previous message: Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs
- Next message: Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the freebsd-performance
mailing list