System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x

Kostik Belousov kostikbel at
Tue Apr 22 12:11:54 UTC 2008

On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 02:08:18PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:31:45PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
> >>On Thu, 21-Feb-2008 at 14:13:22 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:20:04AM -0700, Brett Bump wrote:
> >>>>On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>I cannot reproduce it locally. With patch applied, it compiles both
> >>>>>GENERIC and GENERIC with options QUOTA added just fine.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Check for partially applied patch.
> >>>>>
> >>>>Thanks Kostik.  You can double check me on sizes, but it would appear 
> >>>>that
> >>>>all files in the patch were touched, and I double checked my sources 
> >>>>with:
> >>>> which 
> >>>>are
> >>>The patch is against RELENG_6, not against RELENG_6_2. I see no point
> >>>in backporting it to RELENG_6_2.
> >>>
> >>>BTW, I backported two fixes, one for another deadlock with snapshots and
> >>>quotas, another for "ffs_blkfree: block already freed" panic and followed
> >>>up fsck: softdep inconsistency error.
> >>>
> >>>New combined patch (against RELENG_6) is at
> >>>
> >>I tried to apply this patch to recent RELENG_6 sources
> >>but it failed at a lot of places. I think this is due to
> >>changes to the tree after the above patch was made.
> >>
> >>Is there any newer patch available or is it possible to make
> >>one which applies to recent RELENG_6 sources?
> >
> >
> >
> >May be, I shall commit it finally.
> FYI scottl@ was asking about this yesterday, and seemed interested in 
> helping you to get it committed if necessary.

My worry is the possible mismerge. I do prefer to commit it now, after
some authoritative "no problem seen" message.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :

More information about the freebsd-performance mailing list