System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x

Kris Kennaway kris at
Tue Apr 22 12:08:30 UTC 2008

Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:31:45PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
>> On Thu, 21-Feb-2008 at 14:13:22 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:20:04AM -0700, Brett Bump wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>>>>> I cannot reproduce it locally. With patch applied, it compiles both
>>>>> GENERIC and GENERIC with options QUOTA added just fine.
>>>>> Check for partially applied patch.
>>>> Thanks Kostik.  You can double check me on sizes, but it would appear that
>>>> all files in the patch were touched, and I double checked my sources with:
>>>> which are
>>> The patch is against RELENG_6, not against RELENG_6_2. I see no point
>>> in backporting it to RELENG_6_2.
>>> BTW, I backported two fixes, one for another deadlock with snapshots and
>>> quotas, another for "ffs_blkfree: block already freed" panic and followed
>>> up fsck: softdep inconsistency error.
>>> New combined patch (against RELENG_6) is at
>> I tried to apply this patch to recent RELENG_6 sources
>> but it failed at a lot of places. I think this is due to
>> changes to the tree after the above patch was made.
>> Is there any newer patch available or is it possible to make
>> one which applies to recent RELENG_6 sources?
> May be, I shall commit it finally.

FYI scottl@ was asking about this yesterday, and seemed interested in 
helping you to get it committed if necessary.


More information about the freebsd-performance mailing list