Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
markir at paradise.net.nz
Mon Oct 16 03:40:22 UTC 2006
Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 02:01:08PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
>> For everyone's benefit then, please feel free to submit your patches
>> along with your technical analysis.
> I think his best bet is a fork, instead. Then he can tell all the people
> that volunteer to work on _his_ project exactly what to do, and see how
> far he gets with that approach.
He might have got further by volunteering to create and supply profiles
for those specific workloads that were faster in 4.x than 6.x on UP
machinery etc... i.e. help make 6.x better rather than discourage the
development team (whose efforts are much appreciated by the rest of us
that are happily using 6.x...)
More information about the freebsd-performance