additional ifreq accessors?

[Hans Petter Selasky]

On 2020-04-07 19:26, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> --------
> In message <20200407172151.GB72584 at spindle.one-eyed-alien.net>, Brooks Davis writes:
> 
>> My question for the lists is: should we adopt the
>> more-technically-correct accessors in FreeBSD or stick with
>> slightly-cheaper and more conventional aliasing approach[0]?
> 
> The accessors buys us much more code-isolation, so that would be my vote.
> 

Is there a reason for using "void *" here?

char *ifr_addr_get_data(void *ifrp);

--HPS