additional ifreq accessors?

Poul-Henning Kamp phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Tue Apr 7 17:26:52 UTC 2020


--------
In message <20200407172151.GB72584 at spindle.one-eyed-alien.net>, Brooks Davis writes:

>My question for the lists is: should we adopt the
>more-technically-correct accessors in FreeBSD or stick with
>slightly-cheaper and more conventional aliasing approach[0]?

The accessors buys us much more code-isolation, so that would be my vote.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.


More information about the freebsd-net mailing list