Gratuitous port splitting (was: Port Avidemux)

[Tobias C. Berner]

Moin moin

>From my side, I don't see a reason to have it split either. If there
is no reason for the split for users, and only causes hassle, I don't
see why the ports should remain split.

My suggestion would be to just merge everything into one port, that is
functional and gives you avidemux as a whole, usable package.


mfg Tobias

On Sun, 24 May 2020 at 23:46, Chris <portmaster at bsdforge.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 24 May 2020 09:56:39 -0700 Freddie Cash fjwcash at gmail.com said
>
> > Perhaps the avidemux port should be renamed to avidemux-libs, and then a
> > new avidemux meta-port could be created with basically just an OPTIONS
> > screen where your pick which parts you want installed?
> +1 for that.
> I was going to propose making a meta-port called "avidemux" with options
> that pull only what's required to create a functional port. But decided
> to wait till I got through all my mail first, in case someone as (at least)
> as smart as I am beat me to the proposal. ;-)
>
> --Chris
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Freddie
> >
> > Typos due to smartphone keyboard.
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"