tables in ipfw2

[Nick Rogness]

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 01:09:14AM -0600, Nick Rogness wrote:
>> Is there any reason why IPFW2 has not become the standard
>> IPFW...still not stable enough or ???  IPFW2 is backwards
>> compatible with IPFW is it not?
>>
> It's standard in 5.x.

 	Sorry, I was referring to the 4.10 RELEASE and 4-STABLE.

Nick Rogness <nick at rogness.net>
-
   How many people here have telekenetic powers? Raise my hand.
   				-Emo Philips