tables in ipfw2

[Ruslan Ermilov]

On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 01:09:14AM -0600, Nick Rogness wrote:
> Is there any reason why IPFW2 has not become the standard
> IPFW...still not stable enough or ???  IPFW2 is backwards
> compatible with IPFW is it not?
> 
It's standard in 5.x.


Cheers,
-- 
Ruslan Ermilov
ru at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw/attachments/20040624/a5bca01f/attachment.bin