limiting bandwith
Luigi Rizzo
rizzo at icir.org
Wed Apr 14 07:56:46 PDT 2004
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 04:51:45PM +0200, Ludo Koren wrote:
>
>
> > I do not believe there is a way to "postpone" traffic with
> > dummynet other than what is available with queues, not to
> > mention I don't think you'd ever want to, really. The config
> > below will give mail a lower priority to all of the other
> > traffic, both in and out.
>
> > Nat interactive addresses? Hmmm... you mean you want ipfw to
> > forward local addresses using nat? you want to dole out local
> > ip addresses, dhcp? Not really sure of the question here, but
> > I'm sure its answered by following the link below to the
> > freebsd handbook.
>
>
> I wrote `interactive' (ticks), and I meant addresses that are used to
> connect to ssh, web, etc (interactive processes). All these addresses
> are NAT-ed. For these, your setup is working fine. Thank you very
> much.
>
> The problem, I still have, is the following: the SMTP is flowing
> through, I am not relaying e-mail on this host. It seems to me, I
> cannot put together a rule which pass the traffic and add it to the
> queue except when I use keep-state flag. In this setup (keep-state),
> Luigi wrote it does not work.
i said your configuration does not work the way you want.
It is possible to write a proper configuration that does what
you want but it is left as an exercise to the reader.
cheers
luigi
More information about the freebsd-ipfw
mailing list