IPFW + NATD
phoemix at harmless.hu
Wed May 10 14:00:04 UTC 2006
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:26:45PM +0200, marcel245 at mweb.co.za wrote:
> I am still having huge troubles with using natd with the "divert natd"
> = in ipfw.
> I can only nat all my traffic or none.
> What i would = like to do is simply nat accoring to box or service for
> a particular bo= x.
> This is a example of what works for natting all traffic.
> <= BR>ipfw add divert natd all from any to any via tun0
> Now i = have tried the likes of "ipfw add divert natd all from
> 10.150.200.= 35 to 18.104.22.168 via tun0"
> And that does not work. Ive tried many examples. And cannot come right.
> All = i need to do is nat for a novell srv trying to access a mail
> serve= r pop account.
> Currently im forced to use port forward utilities t= hat dont work.
> Help would really be appreciated.
why don't you simply use pf? pf simply rocks, and the natting facility
is built in(i don't see the point of userspace natting).
i would give it a try if i were you
mailto: gergely.czuczy at harmless.hu
Weenies test. Geniuses solve problems that arise.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/attachments/20060510/a756072f/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-hackers