Building devel/gtkmozedit with libxul gecko provider

[Joe Marcus Clarke]

On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 16:15 +0200, Beat Gaetzi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> We are going to remove xulrunner, Firefox 2 and Mozilla from the ports
> tree. We created a patch which switches all ports using xulrunner,
> firefox or mozilla gecko provider to libxul.
> Unfortunately three ports failed during the exp-run. One of them is
> devel/gtkmozedit which is maintained by the Gnome team. I tried to fix
> this problem but was not successful.
> Could you please take a look at this problem. Is it possible to use
> gtkmozedit with libxul gecko provider? If not, should we remove the port?
> 
> Patch which was tested on pointyhat is available here (updated version
> for current ports tree):
> http://tmp.chruetertee.ch/gecko-ff-removal-part2-v0.3.patch
> 
> Pointyhat log is here:
> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/a.7-exp.20090917174615/gtkmozedit-0.3.0_5.log

The log is gone, but I have no interest in updating gtkmozedit for
libxul.  If none of the other team members reply, then feel free to
remove it.

Joe

-- 
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20090930/1ab236c0/attachment.pgp