HEADS UP: GNOME 2.14 being merged into the tree

[Michael Nottebrock]

Jeremy Messenger schrieb:

>> Also ... seriously, do you guys even check just what is depending on the
>> things you're setting CONFLICTS with? I really was not expecting to see
>> anybody pull a fam->gamin again so soon.
> 
> We had over ten people that tested GNOME 2.14, but it just happened that
> none of us have KDE installed.

All that was needed to detect this particular issue ahead of time was a
ports checkout and grep.

> I fear that it might be end up that KDE and GNOME are in conflict for
a bit while.

I don't see why they should.

-- 
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi at freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20060501/3368c951/signature.pgp