HEADS UP: New gconf key policy
pav at oook.cz
Thu Jun 24 00:59:50 PDT 2004
V čt, 24. 06. 2004 v 03:20, Joe Marcus Clarke píše:
> Please take a look at the latest update to archivers/fileroller, and let
> me know what you think. This is the new gconf policy I think we need to
> adopt if we're to survive the upcoming gconf changes in GNOME 2.8 (it's
> similar to the way we handle OMF files now). This will also make gconf
> handling much more robust with respect to plists.
> The one downside I see with this is that we will miss Makefile bugs that
> prevent proper schema installation. One way around that is to add a
> pkg-install script to each port that installs gconf schemas, and do
> gconf registration there. This may be more work than it's worth,
> What are people's thoughts on this? Thanks.
Packing lists on diet! I prefer @exec/@unexec in pkg-plist over
pkg-install script, that would be bloat. Maybe add a check to portlint
to spit a correct @exec and @unexec lines if they're missing, so porters
don't have to refer to docs for the exact syntax of invocation? Just
like .omf files have it.
Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
<pav at FreeBSD.org>
Do not meddle in the fashions of wizards,
for they are seasonal and quick to fall out of style!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?=
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20040624/d417d6a4/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-gnome