imp at bsdimp.com
Thu Mar 26 02:12:56 UTC 2020
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020, 1:33 PM Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 05:20, Ulrich Spörlein <uspoerlein at gmail.com>
> > This is intentional, please see
> > Only projects and user branches are represented as merges to master, as
> they usually have a full tree. This seemed to match the git model better
> (as opposed to the SVN model).
> IMO we do want vendor code updates recorded as merges. This is already
> happening today for certain updates (svn merge -c <rev> updates I
> believe). For example my most recent ELF Tool Chain vendor update:
How do we both do subtree to not not have the vendor repos commingled
inbour tree and do this?
More information about the freebsd-git