Strange commit

Ed Maste emaste at
Wed Mar 25 19:41:22 UTC 2020

On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 05:20, Ulrich Spörlein <uspoerlein at> wrote:
> This is intentional, please see
> Only projects and user branches are represented as merges to master, as they usually have a full tree. This seemed to match the git model better (as opposed to the SVN model).

IMO we do want vendor code updates recorded as merges. This is already
happening today for certain updates (svn merge -c <rev> updates I
believe). For example my most recent ELF Tool Chain vendor update:

More information about the freebsd-git mailing list