Another svn-git oddity

[Ed Maste]

On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 at 17:32, Ulrich Spörlein <uqs at freebsd.org> wrote:
>
>> I do not believe there are other branches made in a similar way to
>> r300828 (copying just a single subdirectory) but am not certain and am
>> trying to verify that now.
>
> Can you check this in programmatically across all branches?

I can't be certain that I haven't missed anything but at least these
revs are similar:


r184052 (merged r186781)
r205302 (merged r205471)
r214084 (merged r234712)
r300828 (reported earlier)