New nss and firefox

Mikhail T. mi+thun at aldan.algebra.com
Thu Dec 29 17:57:40 UTC 2011


On 29.12.2011 03:36, Florian Smeets wrote:
> Mikhail,
>
> i'll try to explain our rationale one more time.

Thank you very much for your patience.

> a) Sweeping commits are still not allowed as the 9.0-RELEASE process is
> NOT finished yet.

I think, this is the key to our disagreement -- I do not think, updating nss 
from 3.12.x to 3.13.y qualifies as "sweeping". The shared library numbers do not 
change and the new version remains API-compatible and, apparently, even 
ABI-compatible.

> b) We keep nss and ca_root_nss in sync
Then ca_root_nss should be updated too.
> c) not only firefox depends on nss
Actually, firefox does NOT currently depend on nss (nor does thunderbird) -- an 
oversight, that should be rectified ASAP. And the first step towards that is 
bringing nss up to date.

Now, there is, apparently, a reason, firefox build insists on nss-3.13.1 -- some 
sort of attack is possible against the earlier version(s). Comments in 
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=669061 mention that.

Instead of protecting just the browser, FreeBSD ought to ship all of the 
nss-using software (and you included a long list in your previous e-mail) using 
the latest release available. If the API and ABI compatibilities remain, there 
is no reason against updating -- and good reasons for it.

Yours,

    -mi



More information about the freebsd-gecko mailing list