Best practice for high availability ZFS pool
Mark Saad
nonesuch at longcount.org
Mon May 16 23:02:35 UTC 2016
> On May 16, 2016, at 6:50 PM, Palle Girgensohn <girgen at pingpong.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>> 17 maj 2016 kl. 00:47 skrev Rainer Duffner <rainer at ultra-secure.de>:
>>
>>
>>>> Am 17.05.2016 um 00:44 schrieb Palle Girgensohn <girgen at FreeBSD.org>:
>>>
>>> We already have an infrastructure based on ZFS, and I am not sure I do trust ZFS on Linux?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Wouldn’t start with a 20T pool on that one, TBH ;-)
>>
>> There are probably a lot of quirks and workarounds needed that only those who’ve run it for a long time are aware of (if they’re actually aware of them at all).
>>
>>
>> That said, I’ve run into my own problems with zfs send now….but only on 10.3.
>
> We are still 10.2. Are there, in your opinion, regressions in 10.3 for zfs send?
Hi palle
So two questions how is your zpool setup ? Are you using a dedicated slog , and or l2arc ? What level or Zfs raid are you using ?
At work we use leofs on top of zfs . Works well has good relocation and speed , but it's an s3 work like not a general purpose fs .
---
Mark Saad | nonesuch at longcount.org
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-fs at freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-fs
mailing list