Best practice for high availability ZFS pool

[Palle Girgensohn]

> 17 maj 2016 kl. 00:47 skrev Rainer Duffner <rainer at ultra-secure.de>:
> 
> 
>>> Am 17.05.2016 um 00:44 schrieb Palle Girgensohn <girgen at FreeBSD.org>:
>>> 
>> 
>> We already have an infrastructure based on ZFS, and I am not sure I do trust ZFS on Linux?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Wouldn’t start with a 20T pool on that one, TBH ;-)
> 
> There are probably a lot of quirks and workarounds needed that only those who’ve run it for a long time are aware of (if they’re actually aware of them at all).
> 
> 
> That said, I’ve run into my own problems with zfs send now….but only on 10.3.
> 

We are still 10.2. Are there, in your opinion, regressions in 10.3 for zfs send?