why no automount for one zfs?

[krad]

i 2nd that, a zfs list output wouldnt go amiss either

On 4 November 2014 10:26, Matt Churchyard <matt.churchyard at userve.net>
wrote:

> >Steven Hartland <killing at multiplay.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >> On 04/11/2014 09:17, Zeus Panchenko wrote:
> >> > Steven Hartland <killing at multiplay.co.uk> wrote:
> >> >> Missing zfs_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf?
> >> > no, it is on it's place (I run root-on-zfs)
> >> >
> >> Add it,
>
> >the option *is* in /etc/rc.conf, otherwise I couldn't boot since I run
> root-on-zfs
>
> Just to be clear, the root filesystem is mounted slightly earlier in the
> boot process, regardless of rc.conf settings. (Obviously the root
> filesystem has to be mounted before the system can read what you've got in
> /etc/rc.conf)
>
> However, if you don't have zfs_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf, no *other*
> ZFS filesystems will be mounted. This is a very common problem that catches
> quite a few people out, which is why you were asked to confirm.
>
> >> cat /etc/rc.conf
> >---[ quotation start ]-------------------------------------------
> >#-*- conf -*-
> >#
> >zfs_enable="YES"
> >...
> >---[ quotation end   ]-------------------------------------------
>
>
> >>  it will fix you mounting issue.
>
> >the problem exists only for this single fs, all other fs are automounted
> correctly
>
> At the moment I'd look at the possibility of another ZFS dataset getting
> mounted over the top.
>
> Regards,
> Matt
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-fs at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>