FreeBSD support being added to GlusterFS

[Harshavardhana]

>
> it is better imho to uses the one we have in ports, has it receives the normal
> maintainance and avoid having to do the job twice, and it is simpler has well as
> that makes be not having to use autogen.sh but rather use regular macros to
> regenerate the configure/Makefiles

The tarball was provided only as a placeholder and its interim to run
"./autogen.sh"
it is not necessary on an official release which comprises of "./configure" .

In-fact argp-standalone is the one tested and blessed (since one
cannot guarantee
what a FreeBSD port might diverge into)

-- 
Religious confuse piety with mere ritual, the virtuous confuse
regulation with outcomes