Long delays during boot and zpool/zfs commands on 9.1-RELEASE (possibly because of unavailable pool?)

[Henner Heck]

Am 16.05.2013 19:43, schrieb Steven Hartland:
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Henner Heck" <Henner.Heck at web.de>
>
>> Always happy to give someone a special moment.
>> Thank you, now patch did something.
>> It confirmed that it is the wrong file version for the patch,
>> since the replacements failed and the only changes are additions.
>> Output:
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
>> The text leading up to this was:
>> --------------------------
>> |--- sys/boot/zfs/zfs.c.orig    2011-10-20 18:15:29.966685430 +0000
>> |+++ sys/boot/zfs/zfs.c 2011-10-20 18:18:22.291033636 +0000
>> --------------------------
>> Patching file sys/boot/zfs/zfs.c using Plan A...
>> Hunk #1 succeeded at 47 (offset 2 lines).
>> Hunk #2 failed at 423.
>> 1 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/boot/zfs/zfs.c.rej
>> Hmm...  Ignoring the trailing garbage.
>> done
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> I'm still hoping that someone can give the reason for the increased
>> delays.
>> Since nothing actually goes wrong but just takes ages,
>> they might have been introduced on purpose,
>> not considering the possibility of a deliberately unavailable pool.(?)
>
> As I mentioned in my previous response this patch is no longer needed in
> 9.x.
>
>    Regards
>    Steve
>
> ================================================
> This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd.
> and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of
> misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying,
> printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in
> it.
> In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission
> please telephone +44 845 868 1337
> or return the E.mail to postmaster at multiplay.co.uk.
>
>


I got that, and thanks again for trying to help.
I just tried it out to show Roland that i learned
to use patch properly and his hint was not in vain. ;)

Unfortunately the initial issue remains unsolved.

Regards,
Henner Heck