Questions re swap-on-zfs

[Adam Vande More]

On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Beeblebrox <zaphod at berentweb.com> wrote:
>
>
> want to minimise usage of swap-on-SSD
> so as to prevent SSD fatigue for the swap area.
>

This is an invalid concern or at least an inadequately worded one.  All
modern SSD's use static wear leveling.  This plus leaving approximately 10%
of the drive unpartitioned/unused will ensure you'll get as close to the
theoricial limit that one can reasonable achieve.

Swap-on-ZFS is bad for all the reasons swap-on-UFS is and more.

-- 
Adam