ZFS patches.

[Dimitar Vasilev]

2008/11/8 Larry Rosenman <ler at lerctr.org>

>
> >On 01.11.2008, at 02:39, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> >
> >> Can you please give us an indication as to when we might expect to see
> >> either an updated set of ZFS patches (or, better, the patches
> >> committed
> >> to -current).
> >
> >Me too. ;-) I just want to second that request. While I'm also still
> >desperately waiting for an update, basically all I'd like to see at
> >this point is a rough schedule when I/we could expect all the recent
> >changes in Perforce to be in CVS HEAD for testing.
>
> I'd like to 3rd this request.  I'm running a -CURRENT system from August
> with the patches and upgraded
> ZPOOL/ZFS's.   I'd like to get more recent on the system sources, but I
> know
> there are issues with the ZFS
> patch, and would love to see the schedule or a new patch against recent
> HEAD.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> --
> Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler<http://www.lerctr.org/%7Eler>
> Phone: +1 512-248-2683                E-Mail: ler at lerctr.org
> US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-fs at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
Hello,
as I'm simple, I'd stick with commiting ZFS patches for start.
Once in the tree, it's more "easy" from there.
It's up to pjd and core to decide when, but it doesn't hurt ranting.
Happy Sunday to all.