sbp0:0:0 No ocb(260d628c) on the queue
Hidetoshi Shimokawa
simokawa at sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Sat Jul 19 07:52:09 PDT 2003
Some HDD's seems not to work with tagged queuing.
try 'camcontrol [device id] tags -N 1'.
/\ Hidetoshi Shimokawa
\/ simokawa at sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp
PGP public key: http://www.sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~simokawa/pgp.html
At Sun, 29 Jun 2003 14:30:41 +0200,
Manfred Lotz wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I have the following firewire controller:
>
> fwohci0: <VIA VT6306> port 0xc800-0xc87f mem 0xea004000-0xea0047ff irq 3 at
> devi
> ce 12.0 on pci0
> fwohci0: OHCI version 1.0 (ROM=1)
> fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channel is 8.
> fwohci0: EUI64 00:11:06:00:00:00:4a:1d
> fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 3 ports.
> fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes.
> firewire0: <IEEE1394(FireWire) bus> on fwohci0
>
>
> It works quite good with an IBM disk although I also get ack err messages from
> tiem to time.
>
> However when connecting a 80 GB Seagate disk and copying to the mounted
> partition I get lots of messages like this:
> sbp0:0:0 No ocb(260d628c) on the queue
>
> When booting from my rescue CD (FreeBSD 5.0 Current, created in April) the
> copy process seems to work fine despite the "No ocb..."-messages.
>
> When copying from my current desktop system FreeBSD 5.1 Release I additionally
> get kenel panics, e.g. ffs_valloc: dup alloc.
>
> In all cases: If I do a fsck this works fine. No complaints from teh firewire
> point of view.
>
> What should I do to get more meaningful informations which I can provide to
> the developer when making a bugreport? Can I assume to be fine with FreeBSD
> 4.8 STABLE?
>
> Manfred
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-firewire at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-firewire
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-firewire-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
More information about the freebsd-firewire
mailing list