brandelf and LINUXBASE/usr/libexec

[Alexander Leidinger]

Hi,

I read this as old unbranded linux binaries can still reboot the system out of the blue. As such I would say that we should keep the good example of branding of linux binaries (business as usual).

Bye,
Alexander.

-- 
Send via an Android device, please forgive brevity and typographic and spelling errors. Kostik Belousov <kostikbel at gmail.com> hat geschrieben:On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:40:23PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> the issue (reboots on program execution) with unbranded static linux binaries is resolved in all supported branches?
> 
The static linux binaries built with the modern binutils are implicitely
branded.

> Bye,
> Alexander.
> 
> -- 
> Send via an Android device, please forgive brevity and typographic and spelling errors. Kostik Belousov <kostikbel at gmail.com> hat geschrieben:On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:12:18PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > Hi List,
> > 
> > linux ports install some linux ELF binaries at LINUXBASE/usr/libexec.
> > Should those files be branded to linux?
> I do not think any files should branded (in the sense of brandelf(1))
> for any supported FreeBSD release and Linux binary built with
> relatively modern Linux toolchain.