brandelf and LINUXBASE/usr/libexec
Alexander at Leidinger.net
Tue Dec 13 19:59:41 UTC 2011
I read this as old unbranded linux binaries can still reboot the system out of the blue. As such I would say that we should keep the good example of branding of linux binaries (business as usual).
Send via an Android device, please forgive brevity and typographic and spelling errors. Kostik Belousov <kostikbel at gmail.com> hat geschrieben:On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:40:23PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> the issue (reboots on program execution) with unbranded static linux binaries is resolved in all supported branches?
The static linux binaries built with the modern binutils are implicitely
> Send via an Android device, please forgive brevity and typographic and spelling errors. Kostik Belousov <kostikbel at gmail.com> hat geschrieben:On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:12:18PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > Hi List,
> > linux ports install some linux ELF binaries at LINUXBASE/usr/libexec.
> > Should those files be branded to linux?
> I do not think any files should branded (in the sense of brandelf(1))
> for any supported FreeBSD release and Linux binary built with
> relatively modern Linux toolchain.
More information about the freebsd-emulation