2.6.16 for linuxulator & 7.0 release

Boris Samorodov bsam at ipt.ru
Tue Mar 20 22:35:09 UTC 2007


On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:23:48 +0300 Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:00:38 +0100 Alexander Leidinger wrote:

> > ATM it doesn't look like we can enable 2.6.16 by default in 7.0. The reasons:

> It's a pity.

> >  - java showstopper (epoll not implemented)
> >  - futex/TLS for amd64 not in -current for testing
> >  - futexes not completely right
> >  - *at() not implemented
> >  - the time to test a 2.6.16 default until 7.0 shrinks fast

> > Roman has some preliminary work regarding *at() and it looks good to
> > him. He wants me to test some stuff but I don't have enough time in
> > the next weeks because of work related stuff. Any volunteers to help
> > out?

> The next week I'll have an access to needed hardware and have some
> (not many but...). I'm waiting for instructions.

I've got a machine and some time for tests. What should I do?

> > In p4 we have the futex/TLS stuff for amd64 but because of the futexes
> > not completely right part it is not committed to current yet. As we
> > already have the futex and TLS stuff for i386 on a similar level in
> > current, I would say we should go ahead and sync the amd64 stuff. It
> > is not used by default, so we don't break existing linux stuff and we
> > get the benefit of more people being able to have a look at it and
> > play with it. So what are your opinions, shall we give jkim@ the green
> > light to MFp4 the futex/TLS stuff?

> I'd vote for committing.


WBR
-- 
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP
FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve


More information about the freebsd-emulation mailing list