What's the official method to test the build now?
yaneurabeya at gmail.com
Sat Mar 21 19:49:25 UTC 2015
On Mar 21, 2015, at 12:37, Dimitry Andric <dim at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> On 21 Mar 2015, at 17:25, Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mar 21, 2015, at 06:35, Ian Lepore <ian at freebsd.org> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 19:52 -0400, Ryan Stone wrote:
>>>> "make tinderbox" has been broken for weeks, so I presume it's not what I'm
>>>> supposed to be using to test my commits anymore. What's the officially
>>>> supported make target that I'm supposed to use?
>>> I use "make universe", sometimes with the -DMAKE_JUST_KERNELS option.
>> make universe doesn't error out; make tinderbox does however.
>>> But the LINT kernels for x86 and sparc have been broken since January.
> So what's the effective difference between universe and tinderbox then?
> I've built quite a number of universes recently, and I while I did get a
> few errors, they were usually fixed quite quickly.
> Also, universe generates LINT kernel configurations, and builds them. I
> didn't see errors there either... Does tinderbox generate LINT configs
> differently, somehow?
universe gets called by tinderbox. From Makefile:
6 # universe - *Really* build *everything* (buildworld and
7 # all kernels on all architectures).
8 # tinderbox - Same as universe, but presents a list of failed build
9 # targets and exits with an error if there were any.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
More information about the freebsd-current