What's the official method to test the build now?

Dimitry Andric dim at FreeBSD.org
Sat Mar 21 19:37:59 UTC 2015

On 21 Mar 2015, at 17:25, Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 21, 2015, at 06:35, Ian Lepore <ian at freebsd.org> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 19:52 -0400, Ryan Stone wrote:
>>> "make tinderbox" has been broken for weeks, so I presume it's not what I'm
>>> supposed to be using to test my commits anymore.  What's the officially
>>> supported make target that I'm supposed to use?
>> I use "make universe", sometimes with the -DMAKE_JUST_KERNELS option.
> make universe doesn't error out; make tinderbox does however.
>> But the LINT kernels for x86 and sparc have been broken since January.

So what's the effective difference between universe and tinderbox then?
I've built quite a number of universes recently, and I while I did get a
few errors, they were usually fixed quite quickly.

Also, universe generates LINT kernel configurations, and builds them.  I
didn't see errors there either...  Does tinderbox generate LINT configs
differently, somehow?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20150321/b0bc09bf/attachment.sig>

More information about the freebsd-current mailing list