Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

Baptiste Daroussin bapt at
Tue May 8 05:51:05 UTC 2012

On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 08:10:25AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 07/05/2012 12:35 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:06AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> >>> Well for libreoffice on freebsd clang is the official compiler, because
> >>> 4.2.1 is just too old for libreoffice, and I never managed to make it built
> >>> (the 3.5) with gcc from ports.
> >>
> >> What problem are you running into?
> >> I am able to build the latest libreoffice with gcc46.
> > 
> > Really with no modification on the ports?
> Yes. (OK, I lied, see below)
> > Are you sure you are not building it with clang which is forced by default?
> Yes.  I set WITH_GCC in make.conf.
> Some notes:
> - I have boost 1.48 via the patches from the boost port maintainer (long overdue
> to be committed)
> - on one system I build (almost) all ports with gcc46 (base system is built in a
> standard fashion)
> - on another system I build (almost) all ports with base gcc (except, obviously,
> those ports that have USE_GCC=4.6[+])
> And, oh, almost forgot, I had to manually apply the attached patch in cppunit/
> subdirectory on FreeBSD 10.  It seems that the source code in question is
> extracted during build, so it is not possible to apply the patch during normal
> patch target.  The patch is for the well-known FreeBSD1 vs FreeBSD10 confusion
> in autotools.

Yes but only with gcc46 because cppunit needs the same libstdc++ as libreoffice
so with gcc 4.6 is needs to be built with bundled, while it is unbundled with

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :

More information about the freebsd-current mailing list