More if_ath churn coming your way!
adrian.chadd at gmail.com
Sat Jan 22 23:18:16 UTC 2011
On 23 January 2011 02:28, Ian FREISLICH <ianf at clue.co.za> wrote:
>> Someone's reported that the AR9285 was once stable but now isn't. I'd
>> really appreciate it if others who are using AR9280/AR9285 chipsets
>> would test this out and get back to me.
> Oddly enough, I think my AR9285 uses less power now. This I do
> know however: at boot, it associates much much faster. I used to
> have to wait at least 10 seconds for "the default route interface".
> Now, association and DHCP blazes through without pausing.
Can you please verify this? Would you please let me know which version
of the OS you were running before this?
I haven't changed anything on the AR9285 codebase that would account
for the above.
Something to keep in mind with the AR9280/AR9285 support is that I've
seen it be -very- unpredictable - sometimes it's reliable off the bat,
sometimes it's not. You have to repeat it a few times to verify that
you've actually seen a change.
More information about the freebsd-current