[HEADSUP] ZFS version 15 committed to head

Freddie Cash fjwcash at gmail.com
Sat Jul 17 17:12:12 UTC 2010

On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Marco van Lienen
<marco+freebsd-current at lordsith.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 12:25:56PM +0200, you (Stefan Bethke) sent the following to the -current list:
>> Am 17.07.2010 um 12:14 schrieb Marco van Lienen:
>> > # zpool list pool1
>> > pool1  5.44T   147K  5.44T     0%  ONLINE  -
>> ...
>> > zfs list however only shows:
>> > # zfs list pool1
>> > pool1  91.9K  3.56T  28.0K  /pool1
>> >
>> > I just lost the space of an entire hdd!
>> zpool always shows the raw capacity (without redundancy), zfs the actual available capacity.
> I have read many things about those differences, but why then does zfs on opensolaris report more available space whereas FreeBSD does not?
> That would imply that my friend running osol build 117 couldn't fill up his raidz pool past the 3.56T.

You used different commands to check the disk space on OSol (zpool vs df).

Try the same commands on both FreeBSD and OSol (zpool and zfs) and
you'll see the same results.

df works differently on OSol than it does on FreeBSD, you can't compare them.

Freddie Cash
fjwcash at gmail.com

More information about the freebsd-current mailing list