pluknet at gmail.com
Fri May 8 11:13:52 UTC 2009
2009/5/7 Scott Long <scottl at samsco.org>:
> Ollivier Robert wrote:
>> On 7/05/2009 10:17, Bob Bishop wrote:
>>> AFAICS the reference doesn't support that conclusion at all.
>> Nehalem CPUs'HT feature is significantly different from the one present in
>> previous P4 CPUs. Apparently, Nehalem's HT works. Memory bandwidth being
>> much higher helps too.
> I keep here the anecdote that "it's better". Is there a good reference
> somewhere that describes exactly how it works?
There is a number of synthetic, low-level, and h/level application
nehalem tests flowing around in Russian.
Also, not far ago (31.12.2008 18:09) Intel has published the Intel
Optimization Reference Manual for x32/64.
(see ch. 8). It might be useful.
More information about the freebsd-current