scottl at samsco.org
Thu May 7 16:26:12 UTC 2009
Ollivier Robert wrote:
> On 7/05/2009 10:17, Bob Bishop wrote:
>> AFAICS the reference doesn't support that conclusion at all.
> Nehalem CPUs'HT feature is significantly different from the one present
> in previous P4 CPUs. Apparently, Nehalem's HT works. Memory bandwidth
> being much higher helps too.
I keep here the anecdote that "it's better". Is there a good reference
somewhere that describes exactly how it works?
More information about the freebsd-current