bazerka at beardz.net
Tue Feb 26 17:23:33 UTC 2008
Julian Elischer wrote:
> some people have asked me why I would want vimage..
> The answer is because it allows you to do lots of things easily
> that are hard to do normally.
> I can give a very simple example of something you can do trivially on
> Make three virtual machines on yhour laptop:
> The base machine and two others.
> Have the first 'other' machine be assigned an IP address on
> your HOME LAN.
> have the second virtual machine have an IP adddress on
> your WORK LAN.
> use the base machine to run encrypted tunnels from where-ever
> you happen to be to your work and home.. when you put the laptop to
> sleep (assuming the tcp sessions are quiescent (no keepalives))
> then when you wake it up say an hour later.. as soon as the base
> machine has an IP address.. viola, your session on the virtual
> machines are still alive.
> there are SO MANY things you can do with this.. and the framework
> allows us to proceed with more virtualisation including
> separate PID spaces or processor quotas etc.
> BUT the framework will never get the mindshare needed unless people
> start playing with it.
vimage will be a boon for replacing full system jails. I think the more
important question is: why people *wouldn't* want vimage incorporated
into the tree? The benefits it offers are pretty vast and from what I
can see, there are hardly any disadvantages ( although I'm willing to be
enlightened if there are any major gotchas ).
More information about the freebsd-current