suggest renaming and extending the -CURRENT and -STABLE lines

Christian Baer christian.baer at uni-dortmund.de
Thu Oct 11 05:05:59 PDT 2007

Previous message: suggest renaming and extending the -CURRENT and -STABLE lines
Next message: suggest renaming and extending the -CURRENT and -STABLE lines
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:39:59 +0200 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:

> YMMV.  I run both CURRENT and STABLE on production systems.

That is your call to make and allways will be, even if the names are
changed. The point just is, that both are not recommended in the
documentation. And the -STABLE just doesn't reflekt that.

Regards
Chris

Previous message: suggest renaming and extending the -CURRENT and -STABLE lines
Next message: suggest renaming and extending the -CURRENT and -STABLE lines
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the freebsd-current mailing list