idea bouncing: using cvs as a replacement for mergemaster
oberman at es.net
Wed Nov 28 13:16:40 PST 2007
> From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor at gsoft.com.au>
> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:45:26 +1030
> Sender: owner-freebsd-current at freebsd.org
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> > On 2007-11-27 22:45, "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman at gmail.com>
> > > I was thinking seeing the fact that I already have a cvs repo of
> > > - -current does it make sense to just use CVS to update /etc
> > > instead of mergemaster... if so any ideas on doing it cleanly?
> > It may work, but it doesn't ``scale'' to dozens of machines, and you
> > still have to do merging when upstream files (the ones in the FreeBSD
> > repository) change. It's not particularly hard to merge with CVS, if
> > you consider the src/etc files of FreeBSD a ``vendor branch'', but
> > it's not exactly a fun ride either.
> etcmerge does a 3 way merge which makes most updates almost completely
> painless.. It does need to be taught to special case certain files tho
> (ie all of the ones derived from others like spwd.db, aliases.db, etc)
> but apart from that it is very nice.
> It is a port - sysutils/etcmerge.
Another simple solution, which needs more publicity, is 'mergemaster
-U'. I do my updates using -Ui and seldom have to deal any manual
merge. It's not perfect as I still need to deal with locally modified
files, but "it's good enough".
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: oberman at es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 224 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20071128/546cf999/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-current