Panic on -CURRENT after LDT changes
attilio at freebsd.org
Mon May 28 22:53:31 UTC 2007
2007/5/28, Attilio Rao <attilio at freebsd.org>:
> Tor Egge wrote:
> > Finally, I found that i386_ldt_grow() called smp_rendezvous() without
> > temporarily unlocking dt_lock. That caused a deadlock. Adding a temporary
> > unlock of dt_lock seems to solve the problem for me.
> Effectively, there is the need to release the dt_lock before to call
> smp_rendezvous() beacause other threads running on other CPUs will
> contest on this lock and it will cause a deadlock (since their
> curthreads don't hold the lock).
> I think that mantaining the current locking requirements for
> i386_ldt_grow() is still good, since, for how it is used, this is the
> lighter approach. I will add release/unrelease around smp_rendezvous() too.
I've updated the patch. Can you please redownload it and test/review:
Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein
More information about the freebsd-current