INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE patches
Peter Jeremy
peterjeremy at optushome.com.au
Tue May 8 10:12:44 UTC 2007
On 2007-May-07 23:42:39 +0000, "Wojciech A. Koszek" <wkoszek at freebsd.org> wrote:
>"What did this strange guy put into that kernel image to make it work
>correctly"
And the extension of this is "why did he do that?" - which he would
have mentioned in the comments.
>and similar cases people described earlier. Noone mentioned about a
>comments issue.
Because no-one has suggested that comments be stripped out before.
>Once you know what had been included into your configuration file before
>accident, you can find respective comment into src/sys/<arch>/conf
>directory.
In which case, you might as well not bother with the content at all.
The 'include FOO' line will let you find the relevant file in
src/sys/<arch>/conf
>I don't think comments are really all that important.
I presume you don't do any software maintenance. Comments can be
absolutely essential to understand why decisions were made.
--
Peter Jeremy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20070508/589b2fec/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list