CFT: major wireless changes

[Sam Leffler]

Yuri Lukin wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 10:49:26 -0700, Sam Leffler wrote
>> This patch against HEAD imports the work that's been sitting in the 
>> sam_wifi p4 branch:
>>
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~sam/sam_wifi-20070601.patch.gz
>>
>> To apply it do something like
>>
>> cd /usr/src
>> gzcat sam_wifi-20070601.patch.gz | patch -p4
>>
>> Expect one reject in sys/net80211/ieee80211_input.c.rej; it can be ignored.
>>
> 
> In addition to the reject cited above, I also got the following when patching
> a snapshot from today:
> 
> Hunk #91 failed at 5301.
> 1 out of 109 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/dev/ath/if_ath.c.rej
> 
> ***************
> *** 4599,4605 ****
>                  * o notify the rate control algorithm
>                  */
>                 sc->sc_imask &= ~(HAL_INT_SWBA | HAL_INT_BMISS);
> -               ath_hal_intrset(ah, sc->sc_imask &~ HAL_INT_GLOBAL);
>                 /* XXX can't use taskqueue_drain 'cuz we're holding sc_mtx */
>                 taskqueue_drain(sc->sc_tq, &sc->sc_rxtask);
>                 taskqueue_drain(sc->sc_tq, &sc->sc_rxorntask);
> --- 5301,5307 ----
>                  * o notify the rate control algorithm
>                  */
>                 sc->sc_imask &= ~(HAL_INT_SWBA | HAL_INT_BMISS);
> +               ath_intrset(sc, sc->sc_imask &~ HAL_INT_GLOBAL);
>                 /* XXX can't use taskqueue_drain 'cuz we're holding sc_mtx */
>                 taskqueue_drain(sc->sc_tq, &sc->sc_rxtask);
>                 taskqueue_drain(sc->sc_tq, &sc->sc_rxorntask);
> 
> 
> I see there was a change made to if_ath.c in HEAD yesterday related to
> taskqueue_drain. Is it safe to ignore this reject as well?

This is because the driver changed after I generated the patch.  It's
unlikely to be a worry so long as you don't enable polling (which you
should not as it was an experiment that won't go into cvs).

> 
> Thanks for the work - looking forward to vap support. 
> 
>  Yuri
> 
> 
>