CFT: major wireless changes

[Yuri Lukin]

On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 10:49:26 -0700, Sam Leffler wrote
> This patch against HEAD imports the work that's been sitting in the 
> sam_wifi p4 branch:
> 
> http://people.freebsd.org/~sam/sam_wifi-20070601.patch.gz
> 
> To apply it do something like
> 
> cd /usr/src
> gzcat sam_wifi-20070601.patch.gz | patch -p4
> 
> Expect one reject in sys/net80211/ieee80211_input.c.rej; it can be ignored.
> 

In addition to the reject cited above, I also got the following when patching
a snapshot from today:

Hunk #91 failed at 5301.
1 out of 109 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/dev/ath/if_ath.c.rej

***************
*** 4599,4605 ****
                 * o notify the rate control algorithm
                 */
                sc->sc_imask &= ~(HAL_INT_SWBA | HAL_INT_BMISS);
-               ath_hal_intrset(ah, sc->sc_imask &~ HAL_INT_GLOBAL);
                /* XXX can't use taskqueue_drain 'cuz we're holding sc_mtx */
                taskqueue_drain(sc->sc_tq, &sc->sc_rxtask);
                taskqueue_drain(sc->sc_tq, &sc->sc_rxorntask);
--- 5301,5307 ----
                 * o notify the rate control algorithm
                 */
                sc->sc_imask &= ~(HAL_INT_SWBA | HAL_INT_BMISS);
+               ath_intrset(sc, sc->sc_imask &~ HAL_INT_GLOBAL);
                /* XXX can't use taskqueue_drain 'cuz we're holding sc_mtx */
                taskqueue_drain(sc->sc_tq, &sc->sc_rxtask);
                taskqueue_drain(sc->sc_tq, &sc->sc_rxorntask);


I see there was a change made to if_ath.c in HEAD yesterday related to
taskqueue_drain. Is it safe to ignore this reject as well?

Thanks for the work - looking forward to vap support. 

 Yuri