isofs/cd9660 -> relocate to fs/isofs/cd9660?

[Eric Anderson]

On 09/28/06 01:26, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting John Baldwin <jhb at freebsd.org> (from Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:27:29 -0400):
> 
>> We've actually moved most of the filesystems into sys/fs in the past.  Only
>> cd9660, nfs, and ufs are in the top-level.  I'd still say leave nfs and ufs
>> alone, but sys/isofs/cd9660 -> sys/fs/cd9660 (I wouldn't keep the extra isofs
>> directory) probably wouldn't be but so painful at this point.
> 
> I expect a lot of moves when we switch to a VCS where moves are  
> cheap... but on the other hand, maybe this is another bikeshed.
> 
> Bye,
> Alexander.
> 


When is that supposed to happen?


Eric


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Anderson        Sr. Systems Administrator        Centaur Technology
Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't.
------------------------------------------------------------------------