isofs/cd9660 -> relocate to fs/isofs/cd9660?

[Alexander Leidinger]

Quoting John Baldwin <jhb at freebsd.org> (from Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:27:29 -0400):

> We've actually moved most of the filesystems into sys/fs in the past.  Only
> cd9660, nfs, and ufs are in the top-level.  I'd still say leave nfs and ufs
> alone, but sys/isofs/cd9660 -> sys/fs/cd9660 (I wouldn't keep the extra isofs
> directory) probably wouldn't be but so painful at this point.

I expect a lot of moves when we switch to a VCS where moves are  
cheap... but on the other hand, maybe this is another bikeshed.

Bye,
Alexander.

-- 
Vegeterians beware!  You are what you eat.

http://www.Leidinger.net    Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org       netchild @ FreeBSD.org  : PGP ID = 72077137