MFC of bump in libcom_err.so another mistake?

[Kris Kennaway]

On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 06:28:14PM -0800, Sean McNeil wrote:
> 
> On Jan 31, 2006, at 6:25 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> 
> >On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Sean McNeil wrote:
> >>
> >>The point I am making is that this is in the -STABLE tree, not the -
> >>CURRENT tree.  There is no bump of libc and I don't see any reason
> >>for the libcom_err.so revision bump in -STABLE.  IMHO, it didn't make
> >>sense.
> >
> >I don't think it was -stable at the time.  It was probably
> >6.0-current and the version bump occurred just before the
> >release.  As a -current user, you are expected to be able
> >to deal with this and rebuild all your ports if necessary.
> 
> 
> This is EXACTLY what I am saying.  I am not a -current user, I am a - 
> stable user and this happened about a week ago or so.  It was  
> libcom_err.so.2.1 until just recently.

The confusion seems to be that you sent your email to the wrong
mailing list.

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20060131/6884f7a2/attachment.bin