MFC of bump in libcom_err.so another mistake?
kris at obsecurity.org
Tue Jan 31 18:35:22 PST 2006
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 06:28:14PM -0800, Sean McNeil wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2006, at 6:25 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> >On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Sean McNeil wrote:
> >>The point I am making is that this is in the -STABLE tree, not the -
> >>CURRENT tree. There is no bump of libc and I don't see any reason
> >>for the libcom_err.so revision bump in -STABLE. IMHO, it didn't make
> >I don't think it was -stable at the time. It was probably
> >6.0-current and the version bump occurred just before the
> >release. As a -current user, you are expected to be able
> >to deal with this and rebuild all your ports if necessary.
> This is EXACTLY what I am saying. I am not a -current user, I am a -
> stable user and this happened about a week ago or so. It was
> libcom_err.so.2.1 until just recently.
The confusion seems to be that you sent your email to the wrong
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20060131/6884f7a2/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-current