MFC of bump in libcom_err.so another mistake?

[Sean McNeil]

On Jan 31, 2006, at 6:25 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote:

> On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Sean McNeil wrote:
>>
>> The point I am making is that this is in the -STABLE tree, not the -
>> CURRENT tree.  There is no bump of libc and I don't see any reason
>> for the libcom_err.so revision bump in -STABLE.  IMHO, it didn't make
>> sense.
>
> I don't think it was -stable at the time.  It was probably
> 6.0-current and the version bump occurred just before the
> release.  As a -current user, you are expected to be able
> to deal with this and rebuild all your ports if necessary.


This is EXACTLY what I am saying.  I am not a -current user, I am a - 
stable user and this happened about a week ago or so.  It was  
libcom_err.so.2.1 until just recently.