Quick poll (openoffice port)

Ted Faber faber at ISI.EDU
Thu Aug 24 17:23:43 UTC 2006

On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:51:12AM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> Hi
> Just a quick poll to fisd out if it's just me or something else.
> Has anyone managed to compile any of openoffice.org-1.0,
> openoffice.org-1.1 or openoffice.org-2.0 on a recent(ish) CURRENT?

Actually, I've had a problem with openoffice-2.0's java configuration,
which I'm happy to take to whoever I need to.

The problem is that the /usr/local/jdk1.4.1 path is hard-coded a couple
places, but the java/jdk14 port is up to 1.4.2.   Paractically, this
means when I make the OO port, the first thing it tries to do is install
java/jdk14 which fails because java/jdk14 is already installed.
Symlinking /usr/local/jdk1.4.1 to /usr/local/jdk1.4.2 fails further down
the compilation (the error indicates that one of the later OO
configuration steps - not the a ports step - is unhappy about the
symbolic link).

You should be able to reporduce this by just installing jdk1.4.2 and not
jdk1.4.1 and typing make in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0 .

Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber           PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20060824/732d9413/attachment.pgp

More information about the freebsd-current mailing list