DRM update for testing
eta at lclark.edu
Tue Dec 20 13:25:14 PST 2005
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 10:43 +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Eric Anholt <eta at lclark.edu> wrote:
> > Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > Freddie Cash <fcash at ocis.net> wrote:
> > > > Running glxgears at 1024x768x16 gives me a decent 35 fps, compared
> > > > to the 1 fps I used to get. :)
> > >
> > > Uhm. Are you sure that you're running hardware-accelerated
> > > OpenGL glxgears?
> > >
> > > I get 48 fps at 1400x1050x32 -- in software, without any
> > > hardware 3D acceleration. (It's a 1.6GHz Centrino notebook
> > > with shared i915 graphics. 2D acceleration is enabled, of
> > > course.)
> > glxgears is not a benchmark.
> That's right. I was not suggesting to use it as a real-
> world benchmark, but rather as a rough indication whether
> hardware acceleration is enabled at all or not.
> If someone gets 1 fps (!) out of glxgears, something
> is _seriously_ wrong, even with software rendering.
No, that's what I'm trying to say here. There's nothing seriously wrong
with 1 fps software glxgears at full screen, or anything wrong at all.
I get about 9 fps at 1600x1200x16 on my amd64. 1 fps is totally
believable on a different graphics card and a slower cpu.
Eric Anholt eta at lclark.edu
http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt at FreeBSD.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20051220/552a2077/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-current