Beta2: Nice job!
Andrew Gallatin
gallatin at cs.duke.edu
Mon Aug 22 15:21:47 GMT 2005
Alexander Leidinger writes:
> Andrew Gallatin <gallatin at cs.duke.edu> wrote:
>
> > > Ah, so the deal is that you actually don't like the antialiasing
> > > smoothness we all love. Hmm.
> >
> > Maybe it is something wrong with my eyes?
>
> Maybe you have better eyes than other people?
I've always had better than 20:20 vision, so I suppose that
could be it. Maybe I need to get some computer glasses
that make everything blurry :)
> Or you use the default anti-aliasing instead of subpixel anti-aliasing.
I've tried various things in my ~/.fonts.conf. It currently
looks like this:
<match target="font" >
<edit mode="assign" name="rgba" >
<const>rgb</const>
</edit>
</match>
<edit mode="assign" name="hinting" >
<bool>true</bool>
</edit>
</match>
<match target="font" >
<edit mode="assign" name="hintstyle" >
<const>hintslight</const>
</edit>
</match>
<match target="font" >
<edit mode="assign" name="antialias" >
<bool>true</bool>
</edit>
</match>
<match target="pattern" >
<edit mode="assign" name="autohint" >
<bool>true</bool>
</edit>
</match>
> > The odd thing is that when I hook my powerbook to my 1600x1200 lcd,
> > somehow MacOSX makes fonts look decent. They are still blurry,
> > but not nearly so bad.
>
> So this isn't about ordinary analog VGA connection vs. digital DVI connection
> (I assume you use the same connector). But do you use the same fonts?
The connection is DVI in both cases.
I typically use the default fonts in all cases, as it seems the
more I mess with things, the worse I make them.
Drew
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list