Proper way to run bind9
Doug Barton
DougB at FreeBSD.org
Tue Sep 28 06:46:38 PDT 2004
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Juha Saarinen wrote:
>> That same man page then defines the behavior for SIGINT and SIGTERM.
>> Killing named with a signal in this case is harmless, and should be
>> functionally equivalent to 'rndc stop', except in those cases where rndc
>> is buggered for some reason.
>
> Yebbut... hows does that justify ignoring the vendor supplied
> directions for the software in question? We're supposed to use rndc,
> not signals.
How about this. I promise that if there is ever a day when what is
happening now DOESN'T work, I will fix it. Sound like a deal?
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list